A fascinating piece by the FT’s data journalist John Burn-Murdoch on the increasing ideological divergence between young men and young woman across the world. John summarised his research in an X-stream, which we reproduce below, and with a few comments from us at the end:

An ideological divide is emerging between young men and women in many countries around the world.

I think this one of the most important social trends unfolding today, and provides the answer to several puzzles.

My column this week is on new global gender divide and its implications

But let’s dig deeper:

We’re often told Gen Z are hyper progressive. However, other surveys suggest they’re surprisingly conservative 🤔

But breaking things down by sex provides an explanation: young women are very progressive, young men are surprisingly conservative.

Gen Z is two generations, not one. In country after country, surveys show a very similar pattern:

Historically the views of men and women in the same generations have been very similar. This is still true for older age-groups, but a gap has opened between today’s young men and women.

Let’s look at some examples:

Here’s South Korea, where the ideology divide between young men and women is famously wide.

Young women have become markedly more progressive on gender norms, but young men have not budged.

The result? An emerging societal rift.

This is having huge impacts, including reducing rates of marriage and births in Korea, whose birth rate has plummeted to become the lowest of any country in the world.

This has been written about in detail: see “The Real Reason South Koreans Aren’t Having Babies: Gender, rather than race or age or immigration status, has become the country’s sharpest social fault line” (The Atlantic).

But it’s not just Korea. Here’s a striking one for the US:

In contrast to the typical relationship between values and age, young American men hold *more conservative views on gender* than older men.

This has huge social implications. And here’s where it gets most interesting: the divide is not just about issues concerning gender.

This chart for the UK is *remarkable*.

All groups of people, young and old, men and women, have become more liberal on race and immigration *except young men*

And here’s Germany on a similar issue:

Young German women have become markedly more progressive on attitudes to immigrants, while young German men are *more conservative* on this than their elders.

In Poland’s elections last year, 46% of young men voted for the far-right nationalist Confederation party, compared to just 16% of young women.

There was no such divide among older age-groups:

What’s causing all of this? One theory is negative polarisation.

In the wake of the #MeToo movement, young women have both become more progressive and more vocal about their views.

Many young men feel threatened and have reacted by taking the opposite position. This could explain how the divide on gender issues bleeds into other spaces.

If some young men think "young women are woke, I am not" (I know it’s an annoying word), then they will instinctively take non-woke (sorry) positions on other topics.

A complementary theory is that these trends are explained by young men and women increasingly inhabiting different spaces.

So much of daily life now plays out online, and young men and women are in different parts of the internet. Take the algorithmically walled gardens of TikTok.

And this means different — in some cases diametrically opposed — cultures and ideologies can take off quite quickly, and soon you have two halves of a generation who find each other’s views incomprehensible at best, intolerable at worst.

The problem is these theories suggest the divergence will continue, both for today’s young adults and future generations.

Teenagers are growing up in these same ideological bubbles. Hence the popularity of Andrew Tate etc, which is unfathomable to people outside the bubble.

And it’s worth coming back to the original chart:

This trend can not just be palmed off as the sole responsibility of one gender. Young women and young men have both played their part in the divergence.

Korea’s is an extreme situation, but it serves as a warning to other countries of what can happen when young men and women part ways.

Its society is riven in two. Its marriage rate has plummeted, and its birth rate has fallen precipitously to become the lowest in the world.

Where do we go from here? It’s hard to say. One thing that would help is de-segregating online spaces. If top influencers spoke to both sexes instead of just one, that could begin bridging the divide.

Will this happen? Almost certainly not.

I think it’s true that bridging the gap will have to come more from men than women, but I think diagnoses of "toxic masculinity" only exacerbate the problem, causing further negative polarisation.

Young men need better role models, but it’s not their fault they don’t have them.

And one more thought: It would be easy to say this is all a phase that will pass, but the ideology gaps are only growing, and data shows that people’s formative political experiences are hard to shake off.

People’s political and ideological views at age 30 prove really sticky.

Some are [quite reasonably] asking why I presented charts showing that in the west, the divergence has come mainly from women liberalising, and then said "bridging the gap will have to come more from men than women".

My answer: Throughout history each generation has had more liberal views than the last on socio/cultural issues (think racism, gender roles etc)

So part of what we’re seeing here is young women continuing on that long-term trend, while young men aren’t.

And on these issues, it is very rare for a generation to reverse back to a previous generation’s views.

So from a practical perspective it feels much more likely the gap will be closed by men liberalising (in line with historical trends) than women reversing (counter to trends).

So please don’t read a value judgment into my statement that "this will have to come more from men than women".

I simply mean that historical evidence suggests that if this is going to happen, that is the most likely way it will happen.

And I am certainly persuadable by the idea that we may be entering a period where certain progressive shifts *are* susceptible to being reversed.

For example, affirmative action has been repealed in the US, and unlike Roe vs Wade that has not been met with uproar.

So perhaps the gap here will be closed by both sides meeting in the middle. That would be very good! Almost certainly better for solution cohesion than one side doing all the legwork.

Time will tell.

Some shout-outs: First, to Alice Evans whose mountains of work in this space were invaluable for my research. You can read her many excellent articles here

And also to Daniel Cox whose fascinating exploration of how this divide is playing out in the US prompted my piece

More here.

We’d ask from an integral perspective whether this is a good example where conflating developmental stages with Left and Right isn’t all that helpful. If we are in a post-patriarchal shift overall, then young men may be embarking on a different journey than young women, trying to locate their agency anew - perhaps by recapitulating older forms of authority, in order to get to a new place.

It also strikes us, when we look at MAGA crowds and rallies in the US, that there isn’t a shortage of air-punching young women in these crowds. Or that there’s any deficit from that sector in the right and far-right commentariat.

Still, there’s a major transformation underway around the dominant masculinist narratives - on that we agree.

Young men are peeling off from young women ideologically, all over the planet. Or are these just stages of post-patriarchal development?